<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>大統領選挙分析（６）：アメリカが分裂の様相を呈する へのコメント</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redcruise.com/nakaoka/?feed=rss2&#038;p=9" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redcruise.com/nakaoka/?p=9</link>
	<description>フリージャーナリストの中岡望がアメリカの経済や政治について斬新な視点で書くブログ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>texas hold'em より</title>
		<link>http://www.redcruise.com/nakaoka/?p=9&#038;cpage=1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>texas hold'em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9#comment-240</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;texas hold&#039;em&lt;/strong&gt;
I should think it is possible for reason to partially subvert faith; this would happen if, for example, there were a really good argument from premises evident to reason for the denial of something ce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>texas hold&#8217;em</strong><br />
I should think it is possible for reason to partially subvert faith; this would happen if, for example, there were a really good argument from premises evident to reason for the denial of something ce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
